Tag Archives: Atonement theory

The Disposition of the Father in the Atonement of the Son | Jesse Morrell

THE DISPOSITION OF THE FATHER IN THE ATONEMENT OF THE SON We should not view the atonement as God the Father being so angry with mankind that He is about to send them all to hell eagerly, but then the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“My atonement is more substitutionary than yours” – Vicarious Substitutionary Atonement – Penal vs Governmental | Jesse Morrell

THE GOVERNMENTAL VIEW IS MORE SUBSTITUTIONARY THAN THE PENAL THEORY If you deserve penalty and Christ took that penalty, that is only one substitution – Christ is your substitute in suffering the penalty you deserve. But if the atonement substitutes … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Penal Substitution vs. Vicarious Governmental Atonement | Jesse Morrell

This was my response that I made through My Facebook to a post a Calvinist made challenging the doctrine of unlimited or general atonement. “The issue is this: Christ’s death was effectual. It actually ACCOMPLISHED something. It appeased God’s wrath … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment