Tag Archives: Governmental Atonement

A. W. Tozer on the Atonement & Finished Work of Christ | Universal Unlimited Atonement | Synergistic Free Will Salvation

A. W. TOZER on the ATONEMENT of CHRIST! “Redemption is an objective fact. It is a work potentially saving, wrought for man, but done independent of and exterior to the individual. Christ’s work on Calvary made atonement for every man, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Logic of Penal Substitution, Limited Atonement, Universalism

Why is wrong with this syllogism? Major Premise: Jesus took the punishment for our sins. Minor Premise: God cannot justly punish the same sins twice. Conclusion: Everyone Jesus died for is saved from punishment. This is the same syllogism that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Penal Substitution vs. Governmental Atonement | Jesse Morrell | Theology

  Penal Substitution vs Governmental Substitution The penal view says that Christ is our substitute IN penalty. He took the penalty we deserve. The governmental view says Christ’s atonement is a substitute FOR our penalty. He didn’t take our exact … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Disposition of the Father in the Atonement of the Son | Jesse Morrell

THE DISPOSITION OF THE FATHER IN THE ATONEMENT OF THE SON We should not view the atonement as God the Father being so angry with mankind that He is about to send them all to hell eagerly, but then the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“My atonement is more substitutionary than yours” – Vicarious Substitutionary Atonement – Penal vs Governmental | Jesse Morrell

THE GOVERNMENTAL VIEW IS MORE SUBSTITUTIONARY THAN THE PENAL THEORY If you deserve penalty and Christ took that penalty, that is only one substitution – Christ is your substitute in suffering the penalty you deserve. But if the atonement substitutes … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Refutation to Socinianism by the Governmental Atonement View | Jonathon Edwards Jr

This is Jonathon Edwards Jr, the son of the revivalist Jonathon Edwards Sr, on why the atonement of Christ was necessary in order for the forgiveness of sins. This is such a brilliant answer from the governmental atonement camp against … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A Response to Matt Slick of CARM on the Governmental Atonement View

  By Jesse Morrell http://www.OpenAirOutreach.com Matt Slick of CARM (Christian Apologetic Research Ministry) wrote two articles that supposedly “critiqued” the governmental view of the atonement: 1. Substitutionary Atonement of Jesus Christ 2. The error of the Moral Government view of the atonement … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Twenty Four Scriptural Points about the Vicarious Governmental Atonement of Christ | Jesse Morrell

FREE ATONEMENT BOOK The Scriptural Doctrine of Atonement by Caleb Burge has been said to be the best book on the Governmental Atonement theory. Burge expounds upon very profound concepts and presents them in a very intelligent and understandable way. This … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Calvinist Contradiction: Double Jeopardy

CALVINIST CONTRADICTION: DOUBLE JEOPARDY By Jesse Morrell http://www.OpenAirOutreach.com Calvinists charge Arminianism with a “double jeopardy”: Custance said: “No man can be held accountable for a debt that has already been paid for on his behalf to the satisfaction of the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

The Necessity of the Atonement by Rev. Daniel T. Fisk, Newduryport, Mass (1861)

THE NECESSITY OF THE ATONEMENT  BY REV. DANIEL T. FISK, NEWDURYPORT, MASS Printed in The Bibliotheca Sacra and Biblical Repository 1861 The scriptures plainly teach the necessity of the sufferings and death of Christ: “the Son of Man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and of the chief priests and scribes, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment